Ukraine’s
“Older” Brother
By Volodymyr Kish
Putin’s recent re-election to the post
of President of the Russian Federation bodes nothing but ill for Ukraine. As the latest “tsar”, Putin will undoubtedly
continue in his efforts to try and bring Ukraine back into Russia’s orbit,
continuing an imperialistic policy that has lasted some seven centuries.
The enmity between
Russia and Ukraine is obviously nothing new, and reflects a deep-seated
psychological neurosis that infects the Russian psyche and causes them to
conduct a self-destructive foreign policy that makes them the pariah of the
civilized world. Russia’s rulers have
always been paranoid about their neighbours and none more so than Ukraine.
For centuries they
have imposed a harsh rule on their so-called “little brothers”, a rule that has
caused the death of millions upon millions of Ukrainians. The irony behind it all is that historically,
Ukrainians can legitimately claim to be the “older brother” in this destructive
relationship. “Russia” sprang up from
the powerful Kyivan Rus State in the aftermath of the Mongolian invasions in
the Thirteenth Century. Prior to that, the fledgling Slavic principality of
Suzdal-Vladimir was just a primitive northern backwater that eventually evolved
into a Russian state (Muscovy) centred on Moscow. Political power for the then
largest state in Europe was centered in Kyiv, while the Metropolitan of Kyiv
ruled over all of Christendom north of the Black Sea.
After the Mongols
laid waste to Kyiv in the mid Thirteenth Century, the Kyivan Rus State
essentially disintegrated and the Metropolitan of Kyiv moved his seat from Kyiv
north to the safety of the city of Vladimir. In the Fourteenth Century, Muscovy
gained dominance of the northern principalities and in 1328, the Metropolitan
of “all Rus” established his seat in Moscow.
While the remnants of
the Kyivan Rus State struggled to maintain sovereignty against the continuous
incursions of the Tatars, Turks and Poles, the Muscovites grew in strength and
began an aggressive policy of conquest and expansion that eventually saw the
creation of a vast Russian empire.
Of course, most
Russians would not recognize this historical narrative, as they have indulged
in a long standing effort at rewriting history that insists that Kyiv and the
Kyivan Rus State were always historically Russian, and that Ukrainians are but
a culturally inferior offshoot of the Russian people.
And it is this that
probably best explains the Russian “neuroses” that I alluded to earlier. In a recent editorial, journalist Peter
Worthington, who once worked as a reporter based in Moscow, recounts how he
once asked a Russian to explain the historical hostility between Russians and
Ukrainians. The colleague explained that
Ukrainians obviously had cause seeing how Stalin had killed so many million
Ukrainians and attempted to destroy the Ukrainian language and culture. This
was particularly galling in that most Ukrainians felt that they were
“instinctively more intelligent, more civilized, and more efficient than
Russians.” Peter then noted that
explained the Ukrainian feelings, but not why the Russians held such a grudge.
That’s easy replied the colleague - “It’s because Russians also feel Ukrainians
are more capable than they are.”
The essence of it all
lies in a historical cultural inferiority complex, a feeling of backwardness
that can only be compensated by bullying all those around you. This was particularly recognized by Russia’s
Tsar Peter I, who tried desperately to drag the industrially, educationally,
scientifically and socially primitive Russians into some semblance of parity
with the more advanced Western Europeans at the turn of the 18th
Century. Although he did succeed in
making Russia the most powerful military state of that era, the Russians have
never quite been capable of gaining the respect of the rest of the world as a
modern, progressive and civilized state.
A never-ending series of tyrants and dictators, coupled with an
oppressive imperialistic foreign policy has earned them the disdain of the Free
World. We may fear their military
might, but until they start behaving like a mature, democratic state, they will
always be looked upon as a reactionary, backward country.