Time for Western Sanctions Against
By Walter Derzko
Several human
rights watch groups are now calling on Western leaders to impose travel and financial
sanctions on 14 Ukrainian officials who violated human rights and are engaged in
political persecution. (UNIAN, June 10) This follows earlier demands
by Wolodymyr Yavoriwsky and other oppositionists, who called on Western countries
to get tough and impose targeted sanctions against the members of the
Government and
Opposition
leader Yulia Tymoshenko promises to file more lawsuits in several other countries
against President Viktor Yanukovych’s criminal entourage. The first case,
already accepted by a
President
Yanukovych has signed a decree writing off the debts of private Ukrainian energy
companies. (UT1, June 2). It’s an absolute outrage, since the sum surpasses
US $3 billion of IMF-borrowed money that was essentially gifted to friends and relatives,
without impunity. Most Ukrainians buy energy from and pay utility bills to Oblgaz
and Oblenergo, but these corrupt structures don’t pay for consumed gas and electricity,
but launder these public funds directly to offshore holdings. Owners of these
intermediaries include Firtash, Kolomojsky, Surkis, and several Russians (Babakov
- the Russian Deputy Speaker, and Vekselberg).
It would be
interesting to speculate who else could be a target for sanctions.
If
the political
will exists, sanctions can be easily imposed by the EU just for the
show trials
and persecutions against Yulia Tymoshenko and Yurij Lutsenko, who has
been illegally
imprisoned in pre-trial detention since December 2010. Section 27 of a
PACE report
released May 31, supports this: “Recently, the Prosecutor General
opened criminal
cases against a number of former government officials belonging to the
opposition,
including against Ms. Tymoshenko for ‘excess of authority’
and ‘abuse of office’.
We stress that no-one should be above the law, especially government
officials,
but the fact that only former government officials [who] belong to the
opposition
are charged, [and that] could indicate political revenge or selective
justice, would
be unacceptable if that were the case. These concerns seem to be
reinforced by the
fact that the charges do not allege corruption, but rather challenge
the correctness
of political decisions taken by the former government officials when in
office,
which, in effect, would amount to criminalising political
decisions.”
(http://assembly.coe.int/committeeDocs/2011/amondoc16rev2011.pdf)
Sanctions and Embargos in Different Shapes and Sizes.
The top Ukrainian
foreign policy objective in the past year has been to secure visa-free travel to
a number of countries, so that Ukrainian oligarchs can have “free” unencumbered access
to their assets in Europe and
Sanctions
against coal exports are rumoured. Exports are handled by the government, and by
the businesses of Yuriy Ivanyushchenko such as Donbassholding, Lugansk
Coal Company, UGK-2000, and others (while Renat Akhmetov’s role in coal
is rapidly declining). Sanctions against Khlib-Invest, also owned by Ivanyushchenko to control grain trading have
also been proposed.
Targeting
these two oligarchs alone - Ivanyushchenko and Akhmetov - would cut off the
bulk of the funding to and financially devastate the Party of Regions, collapsing
the Yanukovych regime. This would be the game-changing event in Ukrainian politics.
But in the end, Ukrainians can’t rely on the West to solely fight their internal
battles. They need to step up to the plate and demonstrate conclusively to the world
what type of government they really desire.