A Nincompoop by any other
Name
By
Lubomyr Luciuk
A nincompoop emailed me the other day. I’d
share his name but I don’t have it. He’s a “yellow belly.”
In the interests of gender equality, I hasten
to add that ‘he’ might be a ‘she.’ But since I’m dealing with a lily-livered
Lilliputian, I’ll pick on my own brand and assume it’s a ‘he.’
His note arrived only hours
after my opinion-editorial was published. Being read is gratifying, so I won’t
complain too much. There’s also the diversion of getting a rise out of,
probably as I suspect, a public servant, who leads an otherwise pedestrian
existence.
What got him going was a
piece I wrote about a KGB veteran who is now a fugitive holed up in some
church’s basement. Squatting and claiming “sanctuary”, he is apparently unaware
of the fact that planting a “Port-a-Potty” confers no asylum rights, not even
in
Before this ex-apparatchik
went subterranean, he had a hearing at the Immigration and Refugee Board. It
ruled, properly, that he was inadmissible to
Just as I don’t want a Nazi
next door, so too, I don’t want the KGB in
Now, I expect flak whenever
I write. So it’s OK when someone sends a letter to an editor to disagree with
me. Indeed, I have friends who chortle whenever I take one on the chops. A
clever counterpunch sometimes even provokes a guffaw on my part. I can laugh
because I know that before anything appears in print, in this newspaper or any
other, whether I write it or you do, an editor (perhaps several) has verified
that it is neither bogus nor defamatory and that whoever has written it is who
they say they are.
Now that’s critical. Editors
aren’t generally censors. They’re gatekeepers. Not everything gets past them
and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. Their role is not to restrict “free
speech” but to ensure that anyone who has something to say also demonstrates
the courage of their convictions. A person does that by attaching their real
name to whatever they want to share in the public arena.
Many of us have encountered
the loudmouth who corners you at a party and then goes on and on about some pet
peeve. Try to escape by asking why he doesn’t share his views by publishing
them, sweetening your pitch by adding that doing so would edify the otherwise
apparently ignorant masses, and you’ll be told that the mainstream media is
manipulated by sinister forces that prevent “the truth” from “getting out
there.” Actually, what happens is that good editors everywhere work hard to
ensure that bigots and boors rarely get published. Which is exactly what they
should do.
Alas, we now live in a world
where those who believe in conspiratorial cabals have access to innumerable
“chat rooms” and “blog sites” where they can blow their steam while hiding
behind infantile pseudonyms. Obviously underemployed, these troglodytes expend
their waking hours vomiting up whatever they want to, without fear of
repercussion. Quick to invoke their right to “freedom of speech”, these wannabe
writers nevertheless refuse to name themselves. I recently encountered their
caveman culture when I asked some lout, calling himself “the Canadian” (even
though he seems to reside in
I loathe those who would
restrict free speech. But anyone who “shares their thoughts” on the Internet
should be required to identify who they are before they have their say. Hate
speech oozes from those who hide in contrast to free speech which arises from
those not afraid to tell you what they think because they are not afraid to
affirm who they are. That’s why I’ve signed this editorial. Think, say, or
write what you will about what I have to say, but at least you know I’m no
chicken.
Lubomyr Luciuk teaches political geography at the Royal Military College of
Canada in Kingston,
NP -
Readers are encouraged to contact their Member of Parliament by phone, by mail,
or email and request them to press the Government of