World Forum of Ukrainians

 
By Volodymyr Kish

I am in Kyiv for a couple of conferences, the first of which is the World Forum of Ukrainians. This is the fifth such gathering of representatives of Ukrainian organizations from around the world since the first such forum was held in 1992.  These forums are organized by the Ukrainian World Coordination Council (better known by its Ukrainian acronym UVKR – Ukrayinska Vsesvitna Koordinatsiyna Rada), a structure sponsored by the Ministry of Culture of Ukraine.  In theory it is supposed to provide liaison and informational services to the vast numbers of Ukrainians in the diaspora, however, from the very beginning it has been poorly and inadequately funded (approx. $75,000 per year), reflecting the Ukrainian government’s ambivalent and often hostile relationship with its countrymen abroad.

Undoubtedly, this is one of the reasons why I found the organizational aspects surrounding this conference so poorly run.  The registration processes for incoming delegates were chaotic at best, with lack of information, inadequate signage, late and missing program materials, poor on-site coordination and last minute changes in venues.  The opening ceremonies were held at the impressive National Opera Theatre, however, I was somewhat less than impressed to find myself in the nosebleed seats of the fourth balcony. Apparently, some 400 of the best seats were appropriated by the Ministry of Culture for their own people.  Although I realize I may not exactly be a VIP, I would think that the organizers would want to make a better impression on foreign guests that travel half way around the world to attend such an event.  The situation proved even more frustrating the second day when I showed up for the sessions only to be told that even though I was properly registered as a Guest/Observer, the capacity of the hall was limited and only full-fledged delegates and distinguished guests were being allowed in. What a way to win friends and influence people!  In any event, I was able to sneak in and take part, as the security and controls at the venue were pretty slack.

President Yanukovych had been scheduled to address the opening of the conference, however, unsurprisingly, he chose to skip the event and instead sent his Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kostyantyn Hryshchenko.  The Minister was jeered and heckled a number of times during his speech.  Although I found the heckling somewhat bush league, I can understand how some of his remarks, such as how the government was making great strides in democratic reform and fighting corruption, might have struck a raw nerve with some of the delegates.

Throughout the proceedings of the Forum, representatives from dozens of countries presented an overview of the state of Ukrainian life in their home countries, however, almost all of them took the opportunity to vociferously lambaste the Ukrainian government and President Yanukovych in particular for what was happening in Ukraine.  Prominent themes were the prosecution of Yulia Tymoshenko, the assault on the Ukrainian language and efforts to make Russian an official state language, the antics of Ukrainophobe Cabinet Minister Tabachnyk, and the lack of a fair and transparent justice system. These concerns were echoed in the formal resolutions passed by the Forum at the end of its deliberations.  These, impressively, literally numbered in the hundreds and were filled with passion and noble sentiments.  Realistically though, they have little more than symbolic value, as the Forum and the UVKR hold little sway with the current Government of Ukraine, which will likely ignore them like they have ignored the resolutions of the past four Forums. As for the UVKR, its meagre financial resources will enable them to do little more than publish the resolutions.

It is clear that the Forum currently has little direct power or ability to influence what the Ukrainian government does.  Nonetheless, it does have significant value in two respects.  Firstly, is its propaganda value – the Forum was well covered in the national media of Ukraine and demonstrated to all Ukrainians the strong disapproval by the large expatriate Ukrainian community of the policies of the current government.  Secondly, it provided an opportunity for Ukrainian activists from around the world to network, share ideas, establish working relationships and reinforce their solidarity with the Ukrainian cause.

It is a real shame that the Ukrainian government ever since independence has held diaspora Ukrainians in such low regard.  There is a wealth of talent, experience, political and economic capital that could be brought to bear to deal with the many issues that any new fledgling democracy is faced with.  Unfortunately, whether the President has been Kravchuk, Kuchma, Yushchenko or now Yanukovych, they have all chosen to essentially ignore the advice and involvement of Ukrainians abroad in the process of building Ukraine into a modern and democratic country.

Ironically, I recently received a press release from the Ukrainian Embassy in Ottawa, touting how the Ukrainian government viewed improving the relationship with Ukrainians abroad as a priority and was drafting a new law to put the process into effect.  It is to laugh!  The Ukrainian government is good at passing laws.  Its track record in actually enforcing them and making them meaningful leaves much to be desired.