Ukrainian
Canadians Enemy Aliens Again?
By
Walter Derzko
The Ukrainian, German and Japanese Diaspora
still have a strong community memory from the unjustified internment activities
that occurred during first two world wars. These communities solemnly
commemorate the memory of these victims with historic plaques, candle-light
ceremonies and religious masses, yet very few people are pondering the
speculative question: Could it happen again? Many people are surprised to learn
that the conditions and circumstances that lead to the forced internment of
Ukrainian Canadians are now being recreated today, right around the world.
US House Resolution 1553,
tabled in the US Senate earlier this year, is a signal that the US is
prepared to go to war against Iran. It
states: “Expressing support for the State of Israel’s right to defend Israeli
sovereignty, to protect the lives and safety of the Israeli people, and to use
all means necessary to confront and eliminate nuclear threats posed by the
Islamic Republic of Iran, including the use of military force if no other
peaceful solution can be found within reasonable time to protect against such
an immediate and existential threat to the State of Israel.” This could include
a pre-emptive nuclear strike by Israel on Iran. In
August, Navy Admiral Mike Mullen, the US
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, admitted on NBC’s Meet the Press
that “military actions have been on the table and remain on the table for
curbing Iran’s
nuclear ambitions.”
On the other side of the
globe, Russia
announced that all troops in Moscow will
be on “full war alert” which is similar to Canada
declaring the War Measures Act.
Also, Russia has
just ordered an unspecified number of inflatable rubber copies of its planes,
tanks and missiles to fool satellite, air reconnaissance and spies on the
ground in “future conflicts.” Something is afoot.
So, how does this affect Ukraine or
Ukrainian Canadians?
In full disregard for Western
(Canadian, US, EU and UN) sanctions against Iran, Ukraine’s government
considers Iran its “strategic ally and a key trade partner in the north-south
corridor” and is expanding trade, energy and other ties with Iran as Western
companies such as General Electric and Caterpillar are pulling out. Ukraine’s
Deputy Prime Minister Serhiy Tihipko said that there is “great potential for
cooperation between Ukraine and Iran in
aircraft construction, transportation and energy (oil and gas) extraction -
squarely in defiance of UN sanctions.
Should a pre-emptive military strike occur against Iran, Israel
would likely co-opt the USA, the
UK and Canada into
the conflict. Iran
could reciprocate by enticing its allies, Russia and Ukraine into
the war. Should it escalate beyond a regional conflict, then all bets are off. Ukraine and
Ukrainians again end up on the wrong side of the “military line in the sand”
just like in the First World War.
Consider a second even more
dangerous scenario.
With little fanfare and no
mainstream press coverage, the US Senate tabled S.3081 - Enemy Belligerent
Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010. This proposed
legislation goes beyond the terms “enemy alien” (applied to interned Ukrainian
Canadians in World War One) and “enemy combatant”, introducing the phrase
“enemy belligerents”. This is defined as any individual, anywhere in the world,
suspected of any affiliation with terrorism or supporting hostilities again the
USA or
its coalition partners. Such suspects must be turned over to military
authorities and can be detained at the discretion of the President, without being
charged or denied legal representation and held for the duration of
hostilities.
The Russian FSB and Ukraine’s
SBU must be thanking their lucky stars, for such a blessing and gift from the
US Congress in order to silence and neutralize their political critics. Saudi
Arabia has been using similar anti-terrorist legislation to arrest and harass
opposition groups and individuals, political opponents and reformers and human
rights activists since 2004 (Wall Street Journal, August 30, 2010). I
suspect that both Russia and Ukraine will
find the use of similar tactics too tempting to resist. Recently, Russia
greatly expanded the list of groups that it considers as terrorists or
extremists. The improvised explosive device (IED) that exploded in a Russian
Orthodox Church in Zaporizhia during the visit by Russian Patriarch Kiril right
on July 28, 2010 was
no accident. Ukrainian and Russian
intelligence could easily resort to classical Soviet “false flag” tactics,
planting bombs and fake evidence to incriminate key opposition individuals and
groups and tagging them as terrorists. Not only could they become “enemy
belligerents” but since intelligence agencies regularly exchange information,
they could also end up on the American “no fly list”, further curtailing their
movements and liberty.
Reaction by people to these
so-far fictitious scenarios has ranged from denial, surprise and shock – “This
could never happen again” to “You may have a point here.” This seems plausible
to me and maybe the Diaspora should be exploring strategies to mitigate and
lessen the potential negative consequences.
Walter (Wolodymyr) Derzko is
a Senior Fellow at the Strategic Innovation Lab (sLab), and
a lecturer in the MA program in Strategic Foresight and Innovation, Ontario College of
Art & Design (OCAD) University in Toronto.