Bukharin
– A Bonhomie Bolshevik
By Dr. Myron Kuropas
If ever there was an affable Bolshevik, it
was Nikolai Bukharin, once described as “favourite of the party” by Vladimir
Lenin.
Bukharin had a
multi-faceted career. Born in 1887, he
attended
During World War I,
Bukharin was arrested as a “Russian spy” and expelled to
Following Lenin’s stroke,
two leading Jewish Bolsheviks, Grigory Zinoviev, and Lev Kamenev, joined forces
with Stalin to ease Leon Trotsky out of the Communist Party and, eventually out
the country. With Trotsky stymied,
Stalin turned on his two erstwhile allies, and, with the help of Bukharin,
began to undermine them. After a 1935
promise by Stalin that they would not be shot if they confessed, Zinoviev and
Kamenev admitted to monstrous crimes against the State. In 1936, both were tried publicly and
executed. Trotsky was exiled and later murdered while living in
By 1938, Bukharin himself
was accused of being a “Trotskyite”.
Tried during a show trial, he was executed within days. The New York Times declared that
Soviet trial was fair. Asked on one occasion how he could so callously treat
his former comrades, Stalin replied, “loyalty is a malady that affects
dogs.”
In a recently published
book by Paul R. Gregory titled Politics, Murder and Love in Stalin’s
Kremlin: The Story of NIkolai Bukharin and Anna Larina, we learn
more about Lenin’s golden boy. Nikolai,
it turns out was one of the few Bolsheviks who protested Stalin’s forced
collectivization in Ukraine which led to the Holodomor and the death of some 7
million men, women and children.
Bukharin’s falling out
with Stalin began in the late 1920s when he questioned Stalin’s “extraordinary
measures” in the Ukrainian countryside. Mindful of the danger of angering the
Soviet dictator, Bukharin was still popular enough in 1929 to marshal some
support from members of the Soviet Politburo. At what turned out to be the last
free-wheeling plenum of the Central Committee on April 16-23, Bukharin accused
Stalin of demanding a “tribute” from the peasants in order to build Soviet
industrial might. The following exchange
took place:
Bukharin: Why does Stalin insist on tribute - a clear
mistake?
Stalin: And if Lenin used
that expression?
Bukharin: There is
nothing resembling Stalin’s tribute in Lenin.
Stalin: That is not so.
Bukharin; No, it is
so. The proletariat is not an exploiter
of peasants and cannot be. To play with
such terms is illiterate and harmful.
Stalin denied Bukharin’s
charge that “tribute” was a form of “exploitation”. “I am speaking about a kind of tax, a
redistribution of resources from agriculture to industrialization,” he
declared. “To accept Bukharin’s
arguments, Stalin insisted, “the State would have to keep raising prices until
the peasants were satisfied and the exploitive power of the kulaks would
increase.”
Bukharin had crossed his
Rubicon. He had openly disagreed with
Stalin. At age forty-one, Bukharin’s
career was at an end.
Stalin went ahead with
forced collectivization and left Bukharin to ponder his fate. Demoted to a minor industrial post, Bukharin
travelled through
Diagnosed with a serious
lung disease, Bukharin was eventually ordered to the
Bukharin’s efforts to
kiss and make-up with Stalin, meanwhile, failed. Arrested, he confessed and then recanted.
During his show trial, he mocked the proceedings. Convicted of espionage, he was executed in
March 1938. Saved from death by Beria,
Larina was sent to the Gulag, her son to an orphanage. Mother and son were reunited in 1956. Bukharin was rehabilitated in 1988.