UCC on CMHR Doublespeak
“We are disappointed with both the tone and timing (on
Ukrainian Christmas Eve - January 6) of the statement from the
Myth: The Museum
has promised a permanent and prominent gallery for the Holodomor that will be a
distinct and separate [zone], comparable to other zones such as the Holocaust
or Aboriginal zone.
Fact: There
is no expressed intention on the part of the Museum to set up a permanent zone
dedicated to the Holodomor, or for that matter, to
Myth: Content and
layout of the Museum has not been finalized.
Fact: In a recently
issued Tender for Media and Technology Services (dated January 10, 2011), the
Museum’s content is presented in the scope of services. Furthermore,
purchasing commitments are being made on that basis.
Myth: Equating the
Holodomor and other genocides to the Holocaust lessens the power and
significance of the Holocaust, by characterizing it as just one among many
‘nationalist’ crimes against ethnic minorities.
Fact: There is
significant pedagogical value of having both the Holocaust and the Holodomor
displayed equitably and comparably in the Museum. Historians such as
Timothy Snyder (in Bloodlands) have noted, the methods that Stalin’s
Communists first developed in Ukraine and elsewhere in the Soviet Union were in
fact the prototypes of Nazi methods of extermination.
The Museum should attempt to set out the known facts that
point to those who have escaped attention and responsibility for [other] crimes
against humanity. In this respect, there can be no clearer modern example than
telling the Ukrainian Holodomor story distinctly, to ensure people are informed
and can appreciate the brutal nature of Joseph Stalin, [Communism and] the
Soviet regime, responsible for mass genocides, crimes against humanity and
other massive human rights violations.
Alexandra Chyczij, Chair of UCC’s Human Rights Task Force,
stated “The UCC is committed to seeking fair and equitable treatment for
victims of the Holodomor and other crimes of Communism whose stories risk being
hidden away. We call upon the Museum management to cease all procurement
processes that impact the content or layout of the Museum until it is publicly
presented and vetted through an objective and transparent process.”
The