Ukrainians not Giving Up
on Democracy
By
Peggy Nash, MP
When our Aerosvit Ukrainian Airlines
flight touched down in Kyiv a few weeks ago, passengers broke into spontaneous
applause. It had been many years since I had experienced such a reaction on a
flight landing. A mixture of pride and relief brought it on. The following
Sunday, September 30, I witnessed a similar reaction, triggered by the vote
count of the early Parliamentary Elections in
My Swedish colleague and I
were posted in
By midnight on Election
Day, up on the second floor of a school in a poorly lit schoolroom, the 18
members of a multi-partisan local polling station election commission (PEC)
were seated around a large table counting the ballots. They had arrived at the
school at 6 am to prepare to open the poll at 7 am. Party scrutineers and a
couple of international observers watched them closely. Now, two hours after
the polls had closed, the PEC was trying to determine whether the number of
ballots cast was equal to the number of voters crossed off the voters’ list and
to the number of ballot receipts gathered by its members. Being out by even one
ballot could delay their work by several hours, as they would be forced to
review every step taken over the course of the day.
Just after 1 am, the
committee finished the count. The numbers matched up. The room erupted into
spontaneous applause. For a moment, everyone forgot their party affiliation and
took pride in a job well done.
All the international
attention caused by previous corrupt elections, the checks and balances put in
place through legal changes, and the hard work of the thousands of volunteers
who participated as committee members, scrutineers and observers had made a
difference. The sense of pride in making the process work rippled through the
room – and across all political parties.
But soon it was back to
business. Their partisan hats firmly restored, the PEC worked over the next
several hours counting the ballots cast for each of the 20 political parties on
the ballot. Some time before dawn, they determined the final numbers and
reported them to their District Electoral Commission.
It was a laborious and
exhausting process, but it was nonetheless a positive sign for Ukrainians, who
three years ago told the world that they simply wanted a normal democratic
process.
The contrast of this vote
with the Presidential run-off vote in 2004, the so-called Orange Revolution
election that I also observed, was striking. Gone was the euphoria that had
filled the
The election outcome will
probably not provide the stability and clear direction hoped for by many. But
the applause during the vote counting in Kharkiv told me that while Ukrainians
might be disappointed in politicians, they are taking pride in building
democracy.
At a news conference in
Kyiv the day after the vote, the international observer mission reported that
while some problems remain, Election Day was conducted in ‘an orderly and
transparent manner’.
Swedish MP Tone Tingsgaar,
the Special Coordinator of the short-term election observers stated: “Despite
difficult circumstances, these elections were conducted in a positive and
professional manner. The high turnout on Election Day was the Ukrainian
people’s contribution to overcoming the political crisis. It is now the turn of
the political forces to deliver.”
The road to democracy in