Fair Elections:
Think Again!
By
Ron Chyczij,
Recently,
It was only a short 5 years ago that we all
observed the phenomenon of the Orange Revolution – Ukraine’s desperate, but
needed, act of direct democracy played
out in the streets of Kyiv on Independence Square (the ‘Maidan’). Who can forget those heady days? This all set our hearts and minds to thinking
that
Comparison Of Ukraine’s Election Laws
What Was In Place |
What’s Been Changed |
Domestic Observer Groups could monitor
the elections |
Domestic Observer Groups eliminated |
International Observers difficult to
exclude from doing their job |
International Observers easy to exclude |
Central Election Commission had greater
oversight authority to rule on the validity of the elections |
Central Election Commission has less
oversight authority |
Complaints and court challenges could be
lodged on irregularities (fraud) occurring during the counting of votes and
the preparation of ‘Voting Tabulation Results’ (“Protocols’) |
Such complaints and court challenges no
longer allowed |
Court challenges could be filed up to
“5” days after the day of elections. |
Court challenges limited in scope (see
above) and must be filed within “2” days after the day of elections |
Courts must rule on outstanding
challenges |
Courts no longer required to rule; after
2 days all undecided challenges are dropped (become moot) |
Let me give you some examples of how the new
Presidential Election Law will potentially affect the outcome of the upcoming
elections in 2010. You decide what the
intentions of this law really are. What
is most troubling is that the new law stripped away established democratic
provisions already in place. That is to
say, the Verkhovna Rada purposely removed or changed existing sections of the
law that were there to achieve fair elections.
Let’s look:
In addition to the above,
there are several more aspects of the law that do not conform to established
democratic norms and/or make the elections more difficult to conduct
fairly. In fact, the Ukrainian Canadian
Congress (UCC) in conjunction with the Ukrainian World Congress (UWC) prepared
22 specific recommendations to address major concerns, after consulting with
various election law experts. At the
time of their annual general meeting in
The Verkhovna Rada authors
of this law cited “efficiency” as the major rationale for the new law. They should be reminded that a dictatorship
is the most efficient form of governing a country. Eliminating and/or restricting the role of
Election Observers, reducing the oversight functions of the Central Election
Commission and destroying the due process of law – all of which may add some
time, but help ensure clean elections are surely worth preserving. All things considered, this new law reminds
me of what happened at the last presidential elections in
Fortunately since then,
based on a challenge by President Viktor Yushchenko, the Constitutional Court
of Ukraine has struck down some of the more egregious sections of the new election
law – five in total. Nevertheless,
opportunities for greater fraud and manipulation have been created by the new
law and are still there. With this in
mind, UWC and UCC have decided to mount a large international observer mission
to help avoid the type of election fraud that occurred during the 2004
Presidential Elections – prelude to the Orange Revolution. In order to help achieve this, the Canada
Ukraine Foundation (CUF) has organized a cross country speaking tour by
Yaroslav Davydovych – former Head of Ukraine’s Central Election Commission
(CEC) – and one of the few members of the CEC that refused to sign the official
“protocol” after the second round of the 2004 Presidential Elections that
ratified fraudulent voter results.
Subsequently, Mr. Davydovych was made head of the CEC and presided over
the 3rd round of the presidential elections that resulted in the
election of President Viktor Yushchenko.
We will be utilizing the
considerable knowledge of Mr. Davydovych in Ukrainian election laws and his
insider experience to inform the Canadian public of the potential pitfalls in
the current election law as it stands now.
At the same time, we will be seeking additional volonteers from the
Ukrainian Canadian Community interested in becoming International Observers for
the upcoming presidential elections and some financial support from the broader
community. Interested readers are asked
to attend one of his sessions scheduled for
Ron Chyczij is a member of
CUF’s election observer organizing committee for the upcoming presidential
elections in Ukraine (January 2010) and a long time International Observer in
Ukraine, including his role as Chief Observer in the 2007 Parliamentary
Elections. He has prepared several
reports on Observer