Protest
Mounting Over Canadian Museum For Human Rights Contents
Ottawa (December 15, 2010) – Concerns over the proposed contents of the Canadian
Museum for Human Rights, a taxpayer funded national museum set to open its
doors in Winnipeg next year, are growing.
The Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association’s director of research, Dr.
Lubomyr Luciuk, said: “A national museum dedicated to human rights and civil
liberties should be equitable and inclusive in its treatment of the many
episodes of genocide that have befouled human history, as well as focusing on
Canadian stories, particularly those that are less well known. We were therefore
surprised and deeply troubled when the final report of the museum’s Content
Advisory Committee made only one passing reference to Canada’s first national
internment operations and barely mentioned what was arguably the greatest
genocide of 20th century European history, the Holodomor, the Great Famine of
1932-33 in Soviet Ukraine. While we appreciate how difficult it is to tell
every story in such a museum, the clear partiality of its proposed contents is
unacceptable. We are therefore joining the protest against that committee’s
recommendations by launching a national campaign with postcards addressed to
the Honourable James Moore, the Minister of Canadian Heritage. Clearly the
Government of Canada now needs to intervene to ensure that a museum funded by
all Canadians does not elevate the suffering of one community above all
others.”
The growing controversy over the proposed contents of CMHR (see The Globe and
Mail, “Group says rights museum slights sufferings of Ukrainians,”
Dr. Luciuk said earlier that: “The [letter]… makes clear that in return for its
support, the Ukrainian Canadian community was led to expect that the truth
about the genocidal Holodomor and about what happened during this country’s
first national internment operations would be allocated permanent and prominent
space in this publicly-funded national museum. Reading through the final report
of the Content Advisory Committee it becomes clear that those pledges have not
been honoured. Making this letter public puts these facts on the public record.”