Crime
and Misdemeanours in Post-Soviet
Whiskey
Priest, by Alexander J. Motyl
iUniverse
Inc., 143 pages, US$12.95.
Reviewed
by Olena Wawryshyn
A certain segment of post-communist
The luxury cars of the
new super rich on Kyiv’s streets hint of vast sums made illegally, but the
criminal element is largely hidden from the view of tourists. And, Ukrainian North Americans making
pilgrimages to the land of their ancestors, which is at long-last independent,
wilfully overlook it because it is too disturbing to confront it directly.
But it is this repugnant
side of post-Soviet
At a book launch for Whiskey
Priest in
No surprise there – as in
all ways, Whiskey Priest is a crime-fiction thriller. It even pays
homage to the American master of that genre, Mickey Spillane; one of Motyl’s
characters, Jane Sweet, reads the writer’s paperbacks.
Like Spillane’s novels, Whiskey
Priest contains plenty of blatant sex and violence. Set around the time,
though not in the thick of the Orange Revolution, Whiskey Priest focuses
on three main characters. Igor Bazarov is a Soviet migr who teaches at an
American Ivy League university and, on the side, makes money through a
prostitution ring that exploits Ukrainian women. When three of his ex-Soviet
colleagues die in quick succession, the action begins.
The second main character
is Jane Sweet (Ivanka Svit), a Ukrainian-American from
The “whiskey priest” is
Anatoly Filatov, a former KGB agent who used to ferret out Ukrainian
nationalists in Lviv before the fall of the
Calling any of these
characters protagonists doesn’t seem quite right as none inspires much
sympathy. Though both Sweet and Filatov
develop as characters–Sweet comes to better understand her Ukrainian identity
and Filatov, formerly a true believer in communism sheds a tear when he
realizes that his life in a post-Soviet society has no meaning–the people Motyl
creates have a hard edge. For this
reason, though the book is a page-turner, it’s hard to get emotionally
involved.
The staccato style of
writing similarly creates a detached tone. The short, clipped dialogue, much of
it consisting of smart-alecky quips, has the ring of a
Sweet is probably the
closest to being the main hero. To outline her family’s history, Motyl
sporadically diverges from the omniscient narrator’s point of view and presents
passages that can be described as stream-of-consciousness flashbacks or
memories of Sweet’s fami-
ly, interspersed with her own personal thoughts.
This innovative device
works as it allows Motyl to present a great deal of historical background
without slowing down the novel’s quick pace.
Less successful is
Motyl’s portrayal of women; most of them are eye-candy molls. As for the career-oriented Sweet, I wondered,
as a Ukrainian-Canadian woman, whether a Ukrainian-American of roughly the same
age would realistically have such a foul mouth. Her wardrobe also seemed
incongruous. What self-respecting North American woman would wear white pumps
with a red blouse or purple lipstick?!
One
has to give more latitude to Motyl’s depiction of academics because Motyl is,
after all, a professor of Political Science at Rutgers University-Newark. The
author is also the deputy director of the university’s Division of Global
Affairs and co-director of the Central and East European Studies Program at
It is Motyl’s interest in
political theory that adds a dimension to Whiskey Priest that raises it
above a run-of-the-mill thriller. Through Filatov, Motyl explores the
repercussions on an individual of the collapse of a political system and, along
with it, an entire belief system.
“Belief makes us human. Without
belief we are animals,” Filatov tells Sweet in a climatic moment of epiphany.
In the end, because
Filatov has lost his belief and Sweet hasn’t lost all of hers, their fates are
different. But we are left wondering whether Filatov’s assertion that “with
belief we can choose between right and wrong,” is true.