Looking Back: Two Decades at CIUS
My appointment as
director of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies ends as of June 30,
2012, and currently the University of Alberta is conducting an international
search for a successor. I have served as director for almost two decades
(eighteen years as director and one as acting director). As my term is coming
to an end, I would like to look back and note some of the transformations,
accomplishments, and difficulties of the past two decades.
When I
arrived in March 1992, everyone at CIUS was working at fever pitch. As Ukraine
gained its independence, CIUS became a clearing house of information for the
Canadian government and for Western academic, political, and business elites.
New opportunities presented themselves for undertaking academic projects in
Ukraine. At the same time, CIUS had to fulfill its mandate in Canada by
continuing projects such as the Encyclopedia of Ukraine, the curriculum
for bilingual schools, and providing resources for the Ukrainian community.
It was
clear that the demands of a newly-independent Ukraine were overwhelming the
Institute. If CIUS was to achieve measurable long-term results, it needed
greater systematization, with a clear delineation of priorities, functions, and
responsibilities. Thus, Dr. Frank Sysyn, Dr. Danylo Husar Struk, and I worked
out a plan for a fundamental reorganization of CIUS into separate components,
each with its own director, personnel, allocated funds, and programs. In
essence, we created a template not only to serve current needs but also to take
on new projects in an orderly and consistent manner.
The
seeds planted in the early 1990s were carefully cultivated for the next two
decades. CIUS promoted Ukrainian studies by awarding undergraduate, graduate,
and postgraduate scholarships, fellowships, and grants. It became a leading
publisher and developer of publications in Ukrainian studies. Its Ukrainian
Language Education Centre developed, published, and distributed an outstanding
Ukrainian language acquisition program. Not only did CIUS research, organize
and publish the five-volume Encyclopedia of Ukraine, but it continued
the project as an Internet publication.
Without
doubt, CIUS has become a leading centre for the study of Ukrainian history.
Much activity was centered on the translation, editing, and publication of
Mykhailo Hrushevsky’s classic ten-volume History of Ukraine-Rus’. The
Hrushevsky Translation Project required extensive research, as
each volume was provided with an updated scholarly apparatus and an in-depth
analysis by a leading historian. Other history projects included the
researching, writing, and publication of a comprehensive multi-volume
interpretative history of Ukrainians in Canada, the development and completion
of a Historical Dictionary of Ukraine, the initiation and publication of
fundamental works on Russo-Ukrainian relations, the support of publications and
centres of historical study in Ukraine, and the participation of CIUS scholars
in the national and international development of Ukrainian historical studies.
In undertaking
this leadership role, CIUS fostered the expansion and globalization of
Ukrainian studies. It initiated or participated in major projects with
Columbia, Cologne, Bar Ilan, Vienna, Harvard, Munich, St. Petersburg,
Cambridge, and East China Normal universities. It was through CIUS that the
University of Alberta became a focal point of Ukrainian studies beyond Canada
and established an international reputation in the field. The University of
Alberta acknowledged the stature of CIUS by recognizing it as a centre of
research excellence in 1998 and as part of an emerging area of research
excellence in Central and East European Studies in 2001.
The
challenge of a newly-independent Ukraine extended well beyond academia. CIUS
was expected to provide leadership in assisting Ukraine’s transition to a
democratic society and a free-market economy. Thus, CIUS initiated several
large-scale projects. Through a series of conferences, the Canadian Ukrainian
Business Initiative attempted to establish contacts between Ukrainian and
Canadian businesses. Two large-scale projects funded by the Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA) attempted to reform the legislative
process in Ukraine. Senior parliamentary, government, and other Ukrainian
participants came to Canada in order to gain broad knowledge of Canadian
public-policy approaches and processes. Another effort, the Ukrainian
Transparency and Election Monitoring Project, sent Canadians to Ukraine in 2004
in order to give seminars on election laws, policies, and procedures for local
officials; some also acted as international observers.
Considering
the current difficulties in Ukraine, one may question the impact of these
projects. Recently, I asked the opinion of Senator Raynell Andreychuk, who
served on the governing board of the CIDA project. She assured me, on the basis
of her extensive experience not only in Ukraine but also in Africa, that these projects
are the necessary “bricks” for the construction of a more democratic society. I
certainly hope that the senator is correct and that our considerable efforts to
“reform” Ukraine have had some effect.
In
academic matters, however, there is little doubt that CIUS has left a
considerable imprint. In fact, it has helped shape the emergence of
post-communist Ukrainian studies. In Lviv, our close relations with the Ivan
Franko and Ukrainian Catholic universities was further reinforced by the
establishment of the Jacyk Program for the Study of Modern Ukrainian History
and Society, including sponsorship of the journal Ukraïna moderna. In
Kyiv, CIUS is collaborating with the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy National University,
and with the institutes of History and Ukrainian Archaeography of the National
Academy of Sciences. The shaping of Ukrainian studies in eastern Ukraine has
been the primary focus of the Kowalsky Program for the Study of Eastern
Ukraine. The Program’s Kowalsky Eastern Institute of Ukrainian Studies, housed
at the Karazyn National University in Kharkiv, has engaged in numerous research
projects, conferences, and scholarly publications. Its Zaporizhia branch
continues to carry out one of the most extensive oral-history projects in
Ukraine. The annual archaeological excavations in Baturyn have become widely
known in Ukraine and in the diaspora. In addition, the Program currently
supports three important journal publications: Skhid-Zakhid (Kharkiv), Kyїvs’ka
Akademiia (Kyiv-Mohyla Academy), and Kur’ier Kryvbasu (the only
Ukrainian literary journal in the Kryvyi Rih region).
The
many initiatives and accomplishments of CIUS would not have been possible
without an unprecedented fund-raising effort. When I came to CIUS, most of the
budget came from funds allocated by the university. Currently, less than 30
percent of the budget is provided by the university: the rest comes from
endowments, donations, and grants. Over the years, CIUS has pursued a vigorous
and coherent fund-raising strategy based on developing a close personal
relationship with Ukrainian educational foundations, and major and minor
donors. This was not an easy task for me, for I admit that even today I am a
bit uncomfortable asking for money. The response from the foundations and the
community, however, has been outstanding. We are privileged to be working in a
field that enjoys such broad support. It is the donors who make us feel that
what we are doing is vital to the maintenance of Ukrainian culture and
identity. Such support has gone far to ameliorate the many financial crises of
the last two decades.
It is
my belief that the seeds of academic ambition and restructuring planted in the
early 1990s have come to fruition. The Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies
is now indeed the foremost Canadian and a leading world research institute
dedicated to the discovery, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge about
Ukraine and Ukrainians. I am grateful that I was able to participate in the
shaping of the Institute’s multifaceted programs and activities. Needless to
say, CIUS could not have achieved its current stature without excellent
colleagues and staff. CIUS was blessed by a resourceful and hard-working staff
that was able to adjust to changing priorities without losing sight of
long-term goals. I thank not only them but also my family, friends, and donors
who have given me such support. I wish the new director every success and offer
any assistance that I can provide when he or she faces the challenges of a new
generation and era.
Dr. Zenon Kohut
PHOTO
Dr. Zenon Kohut, CIUS Director